The U.S. Supreme Court Grants Cert to Decide Whether the Fair Housing Act Allows for Disparate Impact Claims in Township of Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc.

Schnader Alert by Stephen A. Fogdall:

The U.S. Supreme Court has a granted review in a case that will decide whether “disparate impact” liability — liability based solely on a practice’s alleged discriminatory effect, though the actor had no intent to discriminate — can be imposed under the Fair Housing Act. The Court appears poised to reject disparate impact liability in this setting.

Please click here to read the full Alert.

One Response to The U.S. Supreme Court Grants Cert to Decide Whether the Fair Housing Act Allows for Disparate Impact Claims in Township of Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc.

  1. Pingback: The Future is Dim for Fair Lending Claims Based on a Discretionary Pricing Policy | SchnaderFSB

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: